| Формат | Размер | Скачать |
|---|
| Название | : | |
| Продолжительность | : | |
| Пользователь | : | id 743225453842 |
| Дата публикации | : | ript src= |
| Просмотры | : | layer\/1a390536\/www-embed-player.vflset\/www-embed-player.js |
| Понравилось | : | 928 |
| Не понравилось | : | 20 |
 | i dont know whats wrong but ive had nothing but problems getting this to install its always failing ive made 3 iso dvds so far and it just always fail.ill be glad when they get this right,had this problem with linux mint,ubuntu,fodera,espire linux etc i mean whats the point of providing and iso if will only be successful on certain machines installing ,but runs flawless in the test mode before you install it.tried this on my i5 laptop,,i7 destop,hp x360 laptop which is definitely not old its touch screen,smh i mean whats the problem?!! Комментарий от : @reggiejohnson543 |
 | Can you please make video on Fedora Workstation 31 with KDE Plasma installation? Комментарий от : @VirendraBG |
 | im on ubuntu and my friend tried Fedora 31 and he said that its too much to use the terminal Комментарий от : @tristanwait4itlegendary |
 | is it possible to update fedora 27 to fedora 30 or 31 ??? how ?? Комментарий от : @uma9183 |
 | I love GNOME but I despise hearing guh-NOME being said... it rubs me the wrong way Комментарий от : @classicnosh |
 | It's very stable considering how bleeding edge it is. Комментарий от : @LloydLynx |
 | how do you deal with the mouse problem?? Комментарий от : @blkstn5898 |
 | GNOME is gnasty. Much prefer KDE Plasma. Комментарий от : @sohrobby |
 | I have never seen 'apt' in Debian breaking something up Комментарий от : @ag.4937 |
 | The problem with everything hinging on the meta key is that it's not very efficient for left handed people, like me. Комментарий от : @beardedgeek973 |
 | Has too many bugs over 30 after upgrading. Комментарий от : @jaygames1980 |
 | Can I install this distribution in a 32 bits hardware? Комментарий от : @MasterStroke. |
 | G-nome 🤨. Its pronounced Nome. Silent G bro. 😥😕 Комментарий от : @ironmantooltime |
 | Hi guys, anyone managed to make wifi dongle work with the new version of fedora? Комментарий от : @ariskaraiskos8079 |
 | I left Ubuntu due to security(privacy) concerns around the default $HOME permissions of 755(r-x) and umask=0022 which allow other local user accounts r-x access to each others $HOME dirs by default. Fedora doesn’t allow that and I also discovered how many other things that I love about the close following of upstream GNOME and the pleasant use of DNF to RPM’s, what APT is to DEB’s. You can read the details of my unplanned migration, here: discourse.ubuntu.com/t/am-i-crazy-or-stupid-umask-0022-and-dir-mode-0755-as-defaults-for-home Комментарий от : @chrisrainey3484 |
 | Heads up. They broke docker Комментарий от : @marfagerland |
 | Does Wayland ever going to work on NVidia, any info? I mean.. I always hearing that it doesn't work. I think i tried it and i'm with pretty pretty old machine from before 10 years with Nvidia. But don't remember if there was "problems". The thing is there's some feeling even if it works, it's not "official and stable". Комментарий от : @xWe2s |
| Check out CentOS 8, CentOS Stream, and Fedora Silverblue. Currently considering to switch to one of those. Once and for all. Haha, just posted and you mentioned Silverblue. Комментарий от : @xWe2s |
 | Personally, the one thing that I like about Fedora and there is no substitution is DNF and the old YUM. I miss it since I had to move onto Ubuntu server (native ZFS) and have gone with Pop_OS! for the desktop given how easy it is to be up and running. I'm hoping to go back someday. Комментарий от : @jlewellen4659 |
 | Thank you, IG. Комментарий от : @AnzanHoshinRoshi |
 | I love Fedora because it is stable and is refined, from the choice of programs that it ships with to stability and software availability it just works. Fedora 31 has been bad in my laptop because of some problem of Gnome 3.34 with Wayland that it causes a lot of stutters and mouse freezes during use of xwayland or high cpu usage situations, but I believe that they'll fix it in 1 or 2 weeks (I depend on wayland for the fractional scaling) Комментарий от : @gabrieloliveiradecastro4688 |
 | As you mentioned Clear Linux os is the performance champ but according to me I was a Sluggish experience for me as I installed that OS and beside from losing my all data from Hard Disk it stucks all the time on my Intel core i5 3rd gen laptop with 8GB RAM and leaves the shadows of previouly opened window. It disturbed me a lot so that I removed this os after 30 minutes of Installation. Комментарий от : @muhammadusmankhan6761 |
 | Fedora Linux. In a word? Perfect. 'Nuff said. Комментарий от : @eddieoconnor4466 |
 | I'm a software dev, to install what I need for laravel, I just have to dnf install composer; Ubuntu, I have to grab ppa, apt upgrade, install php 73, or composer 73? Cannot get the name right, because the default version is still 5.6... Fedora includes all php extensions in repo, including symfony packages and php unit, phpmd etc. , so I don't have to get a ppa or do weird naming... Also, fedora version upgrade is easy, other distro breaking, heard too much. Комментарий от : @idtyu |
 | On two separate laptops Fedora has been rough on my temps. The fan seems to run overtime just to keep it under control. No idea why this is. Pop OS worked just fine though and was rock solid. Комментарий от : @jor_r8769 |
 | As an end user, should I install Fedora workstation or Fedora silverblue ? Комментарий от : @stp_79 |
| Is no one else gonna complain that Firefox on Wayland stutters really badly? Комментарий от : @LloydLynx |
 | F31 broke docker, unannounced, making it useless for my workflow and wasted my time trying to find out WTF is going on. Nice one Fedora! Комментарий от : @geoffclements269 |
 | I love fedora. It's probably the best out there, but it hates my Dell laptop. It'd never run without issues on it. No matter what I use, wayland or xorg or whatever. It freezes every so often and the laptop just become unsable until I force shut it down. I know it is kernal related, but it never happens on debian. I was told that if I've ever installed open suse on my laptop before it messes up the hardware. Not sure if it is true or not, but I have installed open suse before on this machine. That issue is non existent on debian. I'm even running debian testing and it is stable as ever. Комментарий от : @MyReviews_karkan |
 | i tried with gnome wayland, 1st it did make my laptop laggy 2nd too many ram usage 3rd it fucked up my amd apu i stick to xfce Комментарий от : @noone-xh3iq |
 | Any deistro looks old and ugly now compared to eXtern OS Комментарий от : @5koKirilov |
 | I hate gnome desktop. It is funny how people defend this iconless only wallpaper desktop. You need extension for desktop functionality but there are a few extensions working. If I were a gnome fan I should try budgie. Fedy discontinued. Unable to install some programs I need. Good bye Fedora! Комментарий от : @SHINAHO |
 | For me it's the one to use on a laptop as it's really modern and just a step down to arch. It's just so easy to get going with disk encryption and BTRFS. Also the plain GNOME is just so much more beautiful than the weird themes of Ubuntu and PopOS. I just love the workflow of plain GNOME. That's why I'm running Fedora on my laptop and Arch on my desktop ;) I even run fedora on my server, it's just a bummer that Traefik isn't working with podman (yet) as I really like the cgroupsv2 stuff and the daemonlessness podman. I just compiled the fedora kernel with the Navi reset bug patch applied with buildah in userland. I mean how cool is that?! Комментарий от : @LampJustin |
 | thank u bro for ur review. i like it! Комментарий от : @ibrahim15ibrahim |
 | Why Fedora? Reliability and up to date. Fedora / Red Hat are “boringly” good at achieving this - same machine upgraded from 27 to 31 with no issues. Even RPM Fusion and the mainline kernel are stable - I get a new kernel every few days and not one borkage! That’s amazing. You still have the freedom to compile software and customise the system while getting regular software and security fixes. Comparing Gnome on other distros is not really relevant - it’s what is running underneath that’s more important. Ubuntu suffers from a PPA disastrous mess - how do you track them down and implement them in an orderly way? e.g. qt5. Is it qt-5.11.1-bionic or qt-5.12.0-bionic? Why is there no upgrade path with PPA’s? Fedora doesn’t suffer from this. Quite often PPA’s just die with no maintainer. Also, in my opinion, Snaps or Flatpaks are not the solution on desktop. The idea of containers is great but it quickly starts to unravel when you see the sheer size of them compared to traditional repositories. You’re talking magnitudes of thousands in size - that’s a terrible design. Sandboxing is great but there are ways to bypass this with X Org, and Wayland isn’t ready yet. It’s just as easy to use Firejail with web apps from the current distros. I get it that it’s the latest trend and that everyone likes to use the latest and greatest, but what you’re all forgetting is most people don’t have two Terabyte drives as default in their laptops. Nor do they have access to super whizzy mega fast unlimited broadband. Remember who your target audience is! In terms of software and updates, Fedora is far more up to date than Ubuntu (without PPA’s) - latest kernels, latest drivers, latest software. It’s comparable to a rolling release like Arch with the exception that it doesn’t implode on you like Arch does. Yes, I can read the Arch Wiki and no I don’t have the time to do this. A lot depends on the user - in my case I just want to get on with work which is why stability is important. Don’t get me wrong I like cross compiling kernels for Raspberry Pi’s and the like, but it’s time consuming and I keep the “tinkering” side of Linux separate from the “work” side which oddly enough pays the bills! Arch is a great learning resource but not everyone wants to be a mechanic - some people just want to drive. Open source is important to me. When Bombono-dvd was removed from the repos I was able to download the source and compile it against the modern boost dependency. It works fine - just some effort required. (And for those of you who are wondering why DVD? Well, slow bandwidth and the cost of USB compared to DVD - there is still a large analogue world out there that needs transferring to digital). Without open source software I couldn’t do this. Take Google’s Picasa - gone forever, no source code, dead. Yet it had one of the best collage creation tools I have ever come across. Shame I can’t access the source code, extract the collage creation part and compile it… On the whole I find Fedora reliable, up to date, secure and customisable - everything I need. Thank you Fedora and Red Hat - you’re awesome! Комментарий от : @alancrobertson |
 | Taking notes 📝 Комментарий от : @AceHardy |
 | What is your thoughts on Silverblue? Комментарий от : @mikaelhamre2715 |
 | Could you make a video about fedora silver blue? Комментарий от : @BIGOTEMACHINE |
 | And still has that terrible gnome software store Комментарий от : @nshusa99 |
 | To answer that last question: it's really just how vanilla it is. I know what software I want to use with Linux. One of the reasons KDE Neon is one of my favorite distros is the fact that the distro comes with the most basic software...and nothing else. No major modifications, no frivolous programs - the only real assumption they make with the distro is that you want KDE, and they don't make a ton of arbitrary choices on top of that. I like that a lot. I almost went the Manjaro route for Gnome, seeing a "minimal" option in its Architect installer, but even that still bloats the installation with unnecessary things. The full installation has a program which claims to return Gnome to a minimal state, but it outright didn't work last time I tried. Brilliant work. Комментарий от : @ThisNameIsVeryClever |
 | I prefer Fedora for it's up to date packages. It's second only to Arch. That being said, I am currently on PopOS because of Nvidia support Комментарий от : @JoshBagwell |
 | Can you help me? I have no sound in Fedora 31. Комментарий от : @radja7589 |
 | Thanks for bringing up how keyboard oriented Gnome can feel. I'm a KDE girl but I was still impressed how nice the menu and searching in Gnome is with all the keybindings. People brush it off as a tablet DE because of its look but you can get something smooth out of it. Also Fedora is the right balance I needed and it stopped my distro hopping. Ubuntu and similar feel too large, have too many things I don't need as a long time Linux user. But I've also grown a bit tired of the super customization of the likes of Arch. I can get my hands dirty but I've also come to appreciate some good defaults and I think Fedora has some good defaults and feels very integrated. DNF was a good example. It's not the flashiest package manager, and certainly not the fastest, but it's never let me down and with RPMFusion has almost everything I need. Комментарий от : @kueller917 |
 | I use Fedora because it's usually very stable, has close to the latest software, and is in many cases more polished compared to many other distros in terms of things that are setup properly out of the box. It has all the development tools I need for work as well so that is a bonus. I also like that Fedora doesn't hide the more advanced stuff from their users like Ubuntu and it's variants tend to. For me Fedora is the perfect development workstation and I use it on all my personal PC's also (without GNOME... speaking of which KDE is looking really good in Fedora 31). Комментарий от : @ryanhere7693 |
 | Am I correct that Fedora is the only distribution that is no longer running the same dbus implementation as everyone else, but using "bus1" with "dbus-broker" instead? Комментарий от : @FreeScience |
 | With Fedora you always feel like you are one step ahead of other distributions when it comes to the technology. And because they upgrade a lot of software packages to new major versions within one release cycle it's a good compromise between fixed and rolling release distributions. Especially Fedora Workstation with the GNOME Desktop feels like one fully integrated coherent system. When using other distributions sometimes I think it's a base system with a desktop environment on top. Unfortunately this is often the case when using KDE Plasma which is a shame because I like KDE Plasma so much. On Fedora Plasma is like an alien. I'm a software developer and therefor really like the idea of Fedora Toolbox, where you can install development dependencies or whatever you want to try out in a container without tainting your base system. After you are done you simply throw away the container. You can even install and run desktop applications e.g. GNOME Builder from the container. I think it's obvious I love Fedora ;-) Комментарий от : @ViktorPankraz |
 | Honestly, I really like how plain and vanilla Fedora is out of the box, and with the bare minimum of software installed by default. I also like having a really updated system without the pains of a rolling distro. Fedora has also really stepped up on the stability front, so things for me have been rock solid. Комментарий от : @ximplex1 |
 | Fedora and Redhat's backend in general are just a whole lot nicer to use when compared to Debian and Arch based systems. It comes with everything you need for both the workplace and personally. All development libraries are easy to get through the default repos. In other words it just works. Комментарий от : @jeremyc6471 |
 | I like Fedora because I like light themes and stock Adwaita looks damn good to me these days. Pop OS makes it really hard to change the theme because the software centre wont adapt the colour palette. The whole look and feel is too unprofessional for me. I won't use Ubuntu 19.10 because I don't like the forced SNAP usage. Also try to recreate a default GNOME setting in Ubuntu, gives you all sorts of trouble. Комментарий от : @simonnmorgan |
 | I was on PopOs but after the 19.10 update it became buggy. So I decided to give fedora a try. So far I love Fedora for its smooth performing vanilla GNOME and stability. Let’s see how long it will stay on my laptop. Комментарий от : @prodeq12 |
 | The stability of fedora is great. Updating from 29 to 30 was easy and without any issues. Комментарий от : @remigoldbach9608 |
 | 12:15 Easy to answer: Right out of the box fedora preconfigures all the network services (DLNA, SMB, DAV, etc) so it's just a matter of going to the configuration panel and enable the "sharing" options. Having a mixed environment with both mac and windows pcs, it's awesome that any fedora box will be visible to both right from the get go. Another thing that still is only working perfectly only on fedora, is bluetooth audio using aptX HD. No clipping, no audio delay, no disconnects. Even with a super cheapy usb bluetooth adapter! And well, we can't forget about Anaconda installer. For example I just installed on a thinkpad T440 which has a tiny 16gb NVMe drive apart from the hard drive, and it used both to create a LVM group in such a way that the SSD is accelerating the hard drive. That was all done fully automatic and I don't even know how did it achieve that. Комментарий от : @TheWilldrick |
 | I think that one of the main reasons for using fedora would be its link with RHEL. Other than that I don't think there is anything 'special' about fedora when compared to the competition. I do really like them pushing Wayland though! Комментарий от : @jabba969 |
 | I like Fedora because it keeps up to date on things like the kernel, mesa etc during releases (Ubuntu does not) and ships updates much quicker. It also bundles development tools like Podman/Toolbox and is a good idea about what the next release of RHEL/CentOS is going to look like. Most of the Fedora changes tend to be massive changes under the hood, with changes that don't come into other distros for years. Комментарий от : @MrLadoodle |
 | It's "Super" key, not "Meta" key :).Meta (and hyper) are different keys entirely. Комментарий от : @AlanPope |
 | ❤❤❤ Комментарий от : @Rthabett |
